on weak growing sites, dwarf rootstocks and under minimal pruning.
From the general
			observations in experimental and commercial plantings, uncontrolled C. Axis does not produce
			satisfactory fruit quality.
This decline in quality can be due to poor color, increased russet and
			sunburn.
			canopy contribute to good fruit quality.
The main limbs are best positioned above horizontal and
			up to 45º to allow more even light distribution for good color development.
The incidence of
			russet is also less apparent under this style of canopy management.
			MM.106 showed no effect on fruit numbers and size.
The light pruning treatment was equal to
			an underpruned C. Axis.
The medium pruning treatment was identical to normal chunk pruning,
			shoot thinning and replacement of fruiting wood as usually practiced with C. Axis.
The severe
			pruning treatment included more vigorous chunk pruning, detailed shortening of all fruiting
			wood and complete removal of 1-year-old shoots.
			This effect could be due to changes in the position of main limbs and general tree shape, and an
			increase in shoot regrowth, thus better protection for young fruits with larger foliage cover.
			Flowers on young wood prolong the bloom period and provide an extended period for damage
			by sprays and unfavorable weather during sensitive phases of fruit growth.
General observations
			in mature commercial plantings do indicate that more detailed hard pruned Fuji trees produce
			better fruit quality in respect to skin finish.
			as a standard component of the production system.
It has been observed in Queensland that the
			netting can reduce russet, sunburn and limb rub due to the modifying effects of the hail netting
			enclosure.
FERTILIZATION OF FUJI
			A fertigation trial conducted at Grove Research Station has demonstrated some effects of
			nitrogen and potassium on red color development in Naga-Fu 1 (Table 9).
The area of red color
			decreased with high nitrogen and under high nitrogen/potassium ratio.
In addition to well-
			established direct influence of nitrogen and potassium on red color in apples there is an indirect
			effect.
High nitrogen stimulates excessive shoot growth and causes poor color via reduced light
			distribution within the tree canopy.
This has
			not been found to be the case in Tasmanian experiments on Fuji.
FRUIT MATURITY
			In Australia, harvest of Fuji occurs during early to mid-April depending on location.
In
			Tasmania, it has been found that Fuji Naga-Fu 2 ripens 175 to 185 days after full bloom.
This
			occurs at about 145 days after the “T”stage of the fruit although, in warmer climates, harvest is
			reported to occur after 115 days after “T”stage.
“T”stage of fruit development is when the top
			of the fruit is at right angles to its stalk.
		
		
			flavor and are unacceptable to the market.
These results highlight the need for this cultivar to be
			harvested at the correct maturity.
			of the fruit, changes from green to yellow as the fruit matured.
It has been found, however, that
			optimal harvest of Fuji occurs when the ground color is more yellow than other commercial
			cultivars of apple.
			especially on young trees.
This brown color decreases dramatically with increasing harvest
			maturity which highlights the need to harvest Fuji apples as mature as possible to ensure
			consumer satisfaction.
			Honey core has not been found to be associated with overmaturity or breakdown in storage of
			Fuji.
Indeed, it is now recommended that slight honey core be present in at least half the fruit at
			the start of harvest.
			very useful in determining harvest maturity in Australia due to seasonal differences.
Research
			on predicting when to harvest Fuji is currently focusing on weekly changes in sugar, firmness
			and starch levels rather than the actual values.
			levels do not increase during storage because at optimal harvest maturity most of the starch in
			the fruit has already been converted to sugars.
FUJI STORAGE
			The Australian experience is that Fuji apples store extremely well, remaining crisp after
			7 months of storage even in conventional coldrooms.
Storage in a controlled atmosphere at 2%
			oxygen and between 1 and 2% carbon dioxide has provided superior quality with fruit remaining
			firmer than in air.
Fuji fruits tolerate oxygen levels in storage below 1%, however, it is essential
			to maintain carbon dioxide at lower levels than oxygen.
They are prone
			to superficial scald especially if harvested early. Australian grown Fuji apples, harvested at the
			end of the optimum period, are subject to increased incidence of core rot problems during
			storage and appropriate control strategies must be employed.
CONCLUSIONS
			Red Fuji is relatively widespread in new commercial plantings across all major growing regions
			of Australia.
It is grown in a diverse range of climatic and soil conditions which contributes to
			variability in fruit quality and inconsistency in quality.
The variety is site sensitive and can
			produce unsatisfactory packouts of high quality fruit in some locations.
			to the “ranch”style of management practiced in most countries outside Japan and Korea.
		
		
Naga-Fu 6 and
			Naga-Fu 12 are being used in most recent orchard developments.
Further improved striped
			strains will be adopted in future plantings.
Medium vigor rootstocks MM.106 and N. Spy are
			most frequently used by growers for semi-intensive C. Axis growing systems.
			plantings.
Excellent eating and keeping quality, time of harvest, wide window of harvest, fruit
			size and productivity are its strongest points.
Red Fuji appeals to consumers who prefer a firm
			but sweet apple.
It retains its firmness and its flavor during long-term storage.
Early harvested
			fruit, however, lack flavor and are prone to superficial scald.
The best indicator of harvest
			maturity is honey core (watercore) with harvest when at least 50% of the crop displays slight
			honey core.
			problems for the Australian growers.
The distribution in 1996 of apple varieties in Australia (Australian Bureau of Statistics).
Tree numbers
			___________________
			
(x 1,000)
%
Production
			______________________
			
(metric tons)
%
			Granny Smith
			Golden Delicious
			Fuji
			Red Gala
			Pink Lady
			Others
			1,114
			 510
			 735
			 821
			 809
			1,546
			13.0
			 6.0
			 8.6
			 9.6
			 9.5
			18.1
			 77,286
			 26,512
			 9,073
			 8,767
			 7,646
			 47,634
			27.6
			 9.5
			 3.2
			 3.1
			 2.7
			17.0